You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-Frequency Pure-Tone Audiometry in Children: A Test–Retest Reliability Study Relative to Ototoxic Criteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ear and hearing (Print), January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1097/aud.0b013e318228a77d |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nuala Beahan, Joseph Kei, Carlie Driscoll, Bruce Charles, Asaduzzaman Khan |
| Abstract |
Good test-retest reliability of high frequency (≥ 8 kHz) pure-tone audiometry (HFPTA) is essential to detect significant changes in hearing threshold caused by ototoxicity. While the test-retest reliability of HFPTA in adults has been extensively studied, such investigations in children are scant. This study aimed to evaluate the test-retest reliability of the HFPTA in normal-hearing children with particular reference to the criteria for ototoxicity. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 10 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2015.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Ear and hearing (Print)
#1,226
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,446
of 250,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear and hearing (Print)
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.