You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fines, Fees, Forfeitures, and Disparities: A Link Between Municipal Reliance on Fines and Racial Disparities in Policing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Policy Studies Journal, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/psj.12412 |
| Authors |
Kelsey Shoub, Leah Christiani, Frank R. Baumgartner, Derek A. Epp, Kevin Roach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 61% |
| Unknown | 9 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 17 | 74% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 48% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,346,385
of 23,671,454 outputs
Outputs from Policy Studies Journal
#117
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,374
of 400,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Studies Journal
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,671,454 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.