↓ Skip to main content

Nuclear power in the 21st century: Challenges and possibilities

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
204 Mendeley
Title
Nuclear power in the 21st century: Challenges and possibilities
Published in
Ambio, December 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13280-015-0732-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akos Horvath, Elisabeth Rachlew

Abstract

The current situation and possible future developments for nuclear power-including fission and fusion processes-is presented. The fission nuclear power continues to be an essential part of the low-carbon electricity generation in the world for decades to come. There are breakthrough possibilities in the development of new generation nuclear reactors where the life-time of the nuclear waste can be reduced to some hundreds of years instead of the present time-scales of hundred thousand of years. Research on the fourth generation reactors is needed for the realisation of this development. For the fast nuclear reactors, a substantial research and development effort is required in many fields-from material sciences to safety demonstration-to attain the envisaged goals. Fusion provides a long-term vision for an efficient energy production. The fusion option for a nuclear reactor for efficient production of electricity has been set out in a focussed European programme including the international project of ITER after which a fusion electricity DEMO reactor is envisaged.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 204 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 39 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 11 5%
Other 8 4%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 67 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 29 14%
Chemistry 14 7%
Physics and Astronomy 11 5%
Energy 9 4%
Materials Science 8 4%
Other 58 28%
Unknown 75 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,325,152
of 25,388,229 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#219
of 1,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,000
of 397,627 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,805 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 397,627 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.