Title |
Use of the Population Grouping Methodology of the Canadian Institute for Health Information to predict high-cost health system users in Ontario
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1503/cmaj.191297 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sharada Weir, Mitch Steffler, Yin Li, Shaun Shaikh, James G Wright, Jasmin Kantarevic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 15% |
Researcher | 2 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 15% |
Lecturer | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
Chemistry | 1 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,651,119
of 23,228,787 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2,875
of 8,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,587
of 398,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#52
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,228,787 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.