↓ Skip to main content

Subtle deficits of cognitive theory of mind in unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients

Overview of attention for article published in European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Subtle deficits of cognitive theory of mind in unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients
Published in
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, September 2011
DOI 10.1007/s00406-011-0250-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christiane Montag, Kathrin Neuhaus, Anja Lehmann, Katja Krüger, Isabel Dziobek, Hauke R. Heekeren, Andreas Heinz, Jürgen Gallinat

Abstract

Alterations of theory of mind (ToM) and empathy were implicated in the formation of psychotic experiences, and deficits in psychosocial functioning of schizophrenia patients. Inspired by concepts of neurocognitive endophenotypes, the existence of a distinct, potentially neurobiologically based social-cognitive vulnerability marker for schizophrenia is a matter of ongoing debate. The fact that previous research on social-cognitive deficits in individuals at risk yielded contradictory results may partly be due to an insufficient differentiation between qualitative aspects of ToM. Thirty-four unaffected first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients (21 parents, 8 siblings, 5 children; f/m: 30/4; mean age: 48.1 ± 12.7 years) and 34 controls subjects (f/m: 25/9; mean age: 45.9 ± 10.9 years) completed the 'Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition'-a video-based ToM test-and an empathy questionnaire (Interpersonal Reactivity Index, IRI). Outcome parameters comprised (1) 'cognitive' versus 'emotional' ToM, (2) error counts representing 'undermentalizing' versus 'overmentalizing', (3) empathic abilities and (4) non-social neurocognition. MANCOVA showed impairments in cognitive but not emotional ToM in the relatives' group, when age, gender and neurocognition were controlled for. Relatives showed elevated error counts for 'undermentalizing' but not for 'overmentalizing'. No alterations were detected in self-rated dimensions of empathy. Of all measures of ToM and empathy, only the IRI subscale 'fantasy' was associated with measures of psychotic risk, i.e. a history of subclinical delusional ideation. The present study confirmed subtle deficits in cognitive, but not emotional ToM in first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients, which were not explained by global cognitive deficits. Findings corroborate the assumption of distinct social-cognitive abilities as an intermediate phenotype for schizophrenia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Germany 2 1%
Unknown 147 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 24%
Student > Master 22 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Researcher 10 7%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 79 52%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Neuroscience 11 7%
Chemistry 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 38 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2012.
All research outputs
#2,226,437
of 23,815,455 outputs
Outputs from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#116
of 1,243 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,915
of 127,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,815,455 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,243 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.