↓ Skip to main content

Band structure engineering in organic semiconductors

Overview of attention for article published in Science, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
241 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Band structure engineering in organic semiconductors
Published in
Science, June 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aaf0590
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Schwarze, Wolfgang Tress, Beatrice Beyer, Feng Gao, Reinhard Scholz, Carl Poelking, Katrin Ortstein, Alrun A Günther, Daniel Kasemann, Denis Andrienko, Karl Leo

Abstract

A key breakthrough in modern electronics was the introduction of band structure engineering, the design of almost arbitrary electronic potential structures by alloying different semiconductors to continuously tune the band gap and band-edge energies. Implementation of this approach in organic semiconductors has been hindered by strong localization of the electronic states in these materials. We show that the influence of so far largely ignored long-range Coulomb interactions provides a workaround. Photoelectron spectroscopy confirms that the ionization energies of crystalline organic semiconductors can be continuously tuned over a wide range by blending them with their halogenated derivatives. Correspondingly, the photovoltaic gap and open-circuit voltage of organic solar cells can be continuously tuned by the blending ratio of these donors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 238 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 30%
Researcher 32 13%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Professor 11 5%
Other 31 13%
Unknown 56 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 62 26%
Chemistry 44 18%
Materials Science 39 16%
Engineering 21 9%
Chemical Engineering 5 2%
Other 7 3%
Unknown 65 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,828,734
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Science
#25,856
of 77,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,741
of 352,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#500
of 1,042 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 77,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,042 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.