| Title |
A systematic review of economic evaluations of cardiac rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-243 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wai Pong Wong, Jun Feng, Keng Ho Pwee, Jeremy Lim |
| Abstract |
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR), a multidisciplinary program consisting of exercise, risk factor modification and psychosocial intervention, forms an integral part of managing patients after myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions, as well as patients with heart failure (HF). This systematic review seeks to examine the cost-effectiveness of CR for patients with MI or HF and inform policy makers in Singapore on published cost-effectiveness studies on CR. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Mexico | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 307 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 11% |
| Researcher | 30 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 59 | 19% |
| Unknown | 110 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 45 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 4% |
| Psychology | 14 | 4% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Unknown | 119 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2012.
All research outputs
#6,854,661
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,352
of 7,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,485
of 166,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#45
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.