↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of bacterial DNA profiles of footwear insoles and soles of feet for the forensic discrimination of footwear owners

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Legal Medicine, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 2,046)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
11 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of bacterial DNA profiles of footwear insoles and soles of feet for the forensic discrimination of footwear owners
Published in
International Journal of Legal Medicine, June 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00414-012-0733-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haruhisa Goga

Abstract

It is crucial to identify the owner of unattended footwear left at a crime scene. However, retrieving enough DNA for DNA profiling from the owner's foot skin (plantar skin) cells from inside the footwear is often unsuccessful. This is sometimes because footwear that is used on a daily basis contains an abundance of bacteria that degrade DNA. Further, numerous other factors related to the inside of the shoe, such as high humidity and temperature, can encourage bacterial growth inside the footwear and enhance DNA degradation. This project sought to determine if bacteria from inside footwear could be used for footwear trace evidence. The plantar skins and insoles of shoes of volunteers were swabbed for bacteria, and their bacterial community profiles were compared using bacterial 16S rRNA terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Sufficient bacteria were recovered from both footwear insoles and the plantar skins of the volunteers. The profiling identified that each volunteer's plantar skins harbored unique bacterial communities, as did the individuals' footwear insoles. In most cases, a significant similarity in the bacterial community was identified for the matched foot/insole swabs from each volunteer, as compared with those profiles from different volunteers. These observations indicate the probability to discriminate the owner of footwear by comparing the microbial DNA fingerprint from inside footwear with that of the skin from the soles of the feet of the suspected owner. This novel strategy will offer auxiliary forensic footwear evidence for human DNA identification, although further investigations into this technique are required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Hungary 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Unknown 77 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Researcher 8 10%
Professor 5 6%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 14 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Engineering 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 17 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2018.
All research outputs
#371,108
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#12
of 2,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,820
of 164,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Legal Medicine
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,046 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.