↓ Skip to main content

What really matters in the social network–mortality association? A multivariate examination among older Jewish-Israelis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Ageing, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 334)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
What really matters in the social network–mortality association? A multivariate examination among older Jewish-Israelis
Published in
European Journal of Ageing, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10433-007-0048-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Howard Litwin

Abstract

The aim of the inquiry was to examine the social network-mortality association within a wider multivariate context that accounts for the effects of background framing forces and psychobiological pathways. The inquiry was based upon the Berkman et al. (2000) conceptual model of the determinants of health. Its main purpose was to identify the salient network correlates of 7-year all cause mortality among Jewish men and women, aged 70 and over, in Israel (n = 1,811). The investigation utilized baseline data from a national household survey of older adults from 1997 that was linked to records from the National Death Registry, updated through 2004. At the time of the study, 38% of the sample had died. Multivariate Cox hazard regressions identified two main network-related components as predictors of survival: contact with friends, a social network interaction variable, and attendance at a synagogue, a social engagement variable. Friendship ties are seen to uniquely reduce mortality risk because they are based on choice in nature, and reflect a sense of personal control. Synagogue attendance is seen to promote survival mainly through its function as a source of communal attachment and, perhaps, as a reflection of spirituality as well. Other possibly network-related correlates of mortality were also noted in the current analysis-the receipt of instrumental support and the state of childlessness.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Master 6 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 31%
Psychology 7 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,638,113
of 23,443,716 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Ageing
#35
of 334 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,163
of 71,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Ageing
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,443,716 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 334 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them