↓ Skip to main content

Tracing the evolutionary history of the pandemic group A streptococcal M1T1 clone

Overview of attention for article published in FASEB Journal, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracing the evolutionary history of the pandemic group A streptococcal M1T1 clone
Published in
FASEB Journal, August 2012
DOI 10.1096/fj.12-212142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter G. Maamary, Nouri L. Ben Zakour, Jason N. Cole, Andrew Hollands, Ramy K. Aziz, Timothy C. Barnett, Amanda J. Cork, Anna Henningham, Martina Sanderson‐Smith, Jason D. McArthur, Carola Venturini, Christine M. Gillen, Joshua K. Kirk, Dwight R. Johnson, William L. Taylor, Edward L. Kaplan, Malak Kotb, Victor Nizet, Scott A. Beatson, Mark J. Walker

Abstract

The past 50 years has witnessed the emergence of new viral and bacterial pathogens with global effect on human health. The hyperinvasive group A Streptococcus (GAS) M1T1 clone, first detected in the mid-1980s in the United States, has since disseminated worldwide and remains a major cause of severe invasive human infections. Although much is understood regarding the capacity of this pathogen to cause disease, much less is known of the precise evolutionary events selecting for its emergence. We used high-throughput technologies to sequence a World Health Organization strain collection of serotype M1 GAS and reconstructed its phylogeny based on the analysis of core genome single-nucleotide polymorphisms. We demonstrate that acquisition of a 36-kb genome segment from serotype M12 GAS and the bacteriophage-encoded DNase Sda1 led to increased virulence of the M1T1 precursor and occurred relatively early in the molecular evolutionary history of this strain. The more recent acquisition of the phage-encoded superantigen SpeA is likely to have provided selection advantage for the global dissemination of the M1T1 clone. This study provides an exemplar for the evolution and emergence of virulent clones from microbial populations existing commensally or causing only superficial infection.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 5%
Netherlands 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Egypt 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 51 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 26%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor 5 9%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 9%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2022.
All research outputs
#16,048,318
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from FASEB Journal
#6,961
of 11,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,392
of 184,943 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FASEB Journal
#43
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,943 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.