↓ Skip to main content

Patient preferences and experiences of CPAP and oral appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a qualitative analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep and Breathing, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
Title
Patient preferences and experiences of CPAP and oral appliances for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a qualitative analysis
Published in
Sleep and Breathing, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11325-012-0739-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernanda R. Almeida, Natalie Henrich, Carlo Marra, Larry D. Lynd, Alan A. Lowe, Hiroko Tsuda, John A. Fleetham, Benjamin Pliska, Najib Ayas

Abstract

The aim of this study is to better understand patients' perspectives and preferences about treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and oral appliance (OA) devices for obstructive sleep apnea.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 2%
Unknown 111 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 13%
Other 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Other 28 25%
Unknown 29 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 34 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2021.
All research outputs
#3,220,355
of 22,952,268 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#105
of 1,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,177
of 165,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#1
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,952,268 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,400 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.