You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping the Scholarship of Fake News Research: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journalism Practice, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1080/17512786.2020.1805791 |
| Authors |
Omar Abu Arqoub, Adeola Abdulateef Elega, Bahire Efe Özad, Hanadi Dwikat, Felix Adedamola Oloyede |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Italy | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 22% |
| Unknown | 40 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 45 | 38% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,529,846
of 24,307,517 outputs
Outputs from Journalism Practice
#123
of 1,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,796
of 402,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journalism Practice
#8
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,307,517 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.