↓ Skip to main content

History in perspective: comment on Jones and Khanna ‘Bringing history (back) into international business’

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of International Business Studies, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
History in perspective: comment on Jones and Khanna ‘Bringing history (back) into international business’
Published in
Journal of International Business Studies, March 2007
DOI 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400258
Authors

Randall Morck, Bernard Yeung

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Taiwan 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Researcher 5 10%
Lecturer 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 31 61%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 16%
Mathematics 1 2%
Philosophy 1 2%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2011.
All research outputs
#7,484,899
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Journal of International Business Studies
#333
of 956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,184
of 76,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of International Business Studies
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 956 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.