| Title |
Biodiversity loss, emerging pathogens and human health risks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-020-02021-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dirk S. Schmeller, Franck Courchamp, Gerry Killeen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 7 | 23% |
| New Zealand | 3 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 359 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 12% |
| Researcher | 41 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 49 | 14% |
| Unknown | 134 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 43 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 63 | 18% |
| Unknown | 153 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 95. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2023.
All research outputs
#440,443
of 25,284,710 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#42
of 2,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,121
of 405,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#5
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,284,710 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.