↓ Skip to main content

Societal costs of air pollution-related health hazards: A review of methods and results

Overview of attention for article published in Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 533)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
50 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Societal costs of air pollution-related health hazards: A review of methods and results
Published in
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, September 2008
DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-6-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tanjima Pervin, Ulf-G Gerdtham, Carl Hampus Lyttkens

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a critical and systematic review of the societal costs of air pollution-related ill health (CAP), to explore methodological issues that may be important when assessing or comparing CAP across countries and to suggest ways in which future CAP studies can be made more useful for policy analysis. The methodology includes a systematic search based on the major electronic databases and the websites of a number of major international organizations. Studies are categorized by origin - OECD countries or non-OECD countries - and by publication status. Seventeen studies are included, eight from OECD countries and nine from non-OECD countries. A number of studies based on the ExternE methodology and the USA studies conducted by the Institute of Transportation are also summarized and discussed separately. The present review shows that considerable societal costs are attributable to air pollution-related health hazards. Nevertheless, given the variations in the methodologies used to calculate the estimated costs (e.g. cost estimation methods and cost components included), and inter-country differences in demographic composition and health care systems, it is difficult to compare CAP estimates across studies and countries. To increase awareness concerning the air pollution-related burden of disease, and to build links to health policy analyses, future research efforts should be directed towards theoretically sound and comprehensive CAP estimates with use of rich data. In particular, a more explicit approach should be followed to deal with uncertainties in the estimations. Along with monetary estimates, future research should also report all physical impacts and source-specific cost estimates, and should attempt to estimate 'avoidable cost' using alternative counterfactual scenarios.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uganda 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Belarus 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 119 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 19%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Postgraduate 8 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 19 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 27 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 13 10%
Engineering 11 9%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Other 24 19%
Unknown 26 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2017.
All research outputs
#2,575,173
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#49
of 533 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,401
of 98,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 533 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them