You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physical Function Outcome in Cervical Radiculopathy Patients After Physiotherapy Alone Compared With Anterior Surgery Followed by Physiotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Spine, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1097/brs.0b013e31826d2cbb |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anneli Peolsson, Anne Söderlund, Markus Engquist, Bengt Lind, Håkan Löfgren, Ludek Vavruch, Anders Holtz, Annelie Winström-Christersson, Ingrid Isaksson, Birgitta Öberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 40 | 43% |
| Spain | 9 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Greece | 1 | 1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 70 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 11% |
| Scientists | 9 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 282 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 277 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 50 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 29 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 55 | 20% |
| Unknown | 67 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 104 | 37% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 54 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 6% |
| Unknown | 80 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#557,528
of 24,836,260 outputs
Outputs from Spine
#87
of 8,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,358
of 294,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spine
#2
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,836,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.