You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Opposing Effects of Circadian Clock Genes Bmal1 and Period2 in Regulation of VEGF-Dependent Angiogenesis in Developing Zebrafish
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell Reports, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.07.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lasse Dahl Jensen, Ziquan Cao, Masaki Nakamura, Yunlong Yang, Lars Bräutigam, Patrik Andersson, Yin Zhang, Eric Wahlberg, Toste Länne, Kayoko Hosaka, Yihai Cao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 29 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,192,016
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#9,409
of 13,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,522
of 189,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#31
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,189 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.