↓ Skip to main content

German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease

Overview of attention for article published in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00423-016-1463-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

I. Iesalnieks, A. Ommer, S. Petersen, D. Doll, A. Herold

Abstract

The present national guideline aims to provide recommendations for physicians involved in the treatment of patients with pilonidal disease. It has been published previously as an extended version in German language. This is a systemic literature review. The present guideline was reviewed and accepted by an expert panel in a consensus conference. Some of the present guideline conclusions were based on low- to moderate-quality trials. Therefore, an agreement was necessary in those cases to provide recommendations. However, recommendations regarding the most frequently used surgical procedures were based on numerous prospective randomized trials. An asymptomatic pilonidal disease does not require treatment. A pilonidal abscess should be incised. After regression of the acute inflammation, a definitive treatment method should be applied. An excision is the standard treatment method for the chronic pilonidal disease. Open wound healing is associated with a low postoperative morbidity rate; however, it is complicated by a long healing time. The minimally invasive procedures (e.g., pit picking surgery) represent a potential treatment option for a limited chronic pilonidal disease. However, the recurrence rate is higher compared to open healing. Excision followed by a midline wound closure is associated with a considerable recurrence rate and increased incidence of wound complications and should therefore be abandoned. Off-midline procedures can be adopted as a primary treatment option in chronic pilonidal disease. At present, there is no evidence of any outcome differences between various off-midline procedures. The Limberg flap and the Karydakis flap are most thoroughly analyzed off-midline procedures.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Other 10 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 25 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#4,686,696
of 23,466,057 outputs
Outputs from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#113
of 1,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,446
of 328,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,466,057 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.