↓ Skip to main content

Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 and D2 and Non-Clinical Psychotic Experiences in Childhood

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D3 and D2 and Non-Clinical Psychotic Experiences in Childhood
Published in
PLOS ONE, July 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0041575
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna-Maija Tolppanen, Adrian Sayers, William D. Fraser, Glyn Lewis, Stanley Zammit, John McGrath, Debbie A. Lawlor

Abstract

Non-clinical psychotic experiences are common and distressing. It has been hypothesized that early life vitamin D deficiency may be a risk factor for psychosis-related outcomes, but it is not known if circulating concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) during childhood are associated with psychosis-related outcomes or whether the two different forms of 25(OH)D, (25(OH)D(3) and 25(OH)D(2), have similar associations with psychosis-related outcomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 57 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 5 8%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 22%
Psychology 11 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 23 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,880,816
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#183,928
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,244
of 179,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,183
of 4,011 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,011 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.