↓ Skip to main content

How disclosure quality affects the level of information asymmetry

Overview of attention for article published in Review of Accounting Studies, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
531 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
477 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
How disclosure quality affects the level of information asymmetry
Published in
Review of Accounting Studies, April 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11142-007-9032-5
Authors

Stephen Brown, Stephen A. Hillegeist

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 464 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 125 26%
Student > Master 72 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 29 6%
Student > Bachelor 29 6%
Professor 27 6%
Other 81 17%
Unknown 114 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 225 47%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 94 20%
Social Sciences 12 3%
Unspecified 3 <1%
Computer Science 3 <1%
Other 12 3%
Unknown 128 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2013.
All research outputs
#7,484,899
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Review of Accounting Studies
#63
of 175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,005
of 76,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Accounting Studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them