| Title |
Tea and human health: biomedical functions of tea active components and current issues
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1631/jzus.b1500001 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zong-mao Chen, Zhi Lin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 14% |
| Researcher | 11 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 30 | 17% |
| Unknown | 53 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 62 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#804,332
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#13
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,929
of 272,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Zhejiang University - Science B
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.