| Title |
MRI of the lung (2/3). Why … when … how?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Insights into Imaging, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13244-011-0146-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Biederer, M. Beer, W. Hirsch, J. Wild, M. Fabel, M. Puderbach, E. J. R. Van Beek |
| Abstract |
Among the modalities for lung imaging, proton magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been the latest to be introduced into clinical practice. Its value to replace X-ray and computed tomography (CT) when radiation exposure or iodinated contrast material is contra-indicated is well acknowledged: i.e. for paediatric patients and pregnant women or for scientific use. One of the reasons why MRI of the lung is still rarely used, except in a few centres, is the lack of consistent protocols customised to clinical needs. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 40 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 48 | 22% |
| Unknown | 36 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 38% |
| Engineering | 34 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 24 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,544,447
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Insights into Imaging
#284
of 1,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,853
of 257,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Insights into Imaging
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them