↓ Skip to main content

Tabu search techniques for the heterogeneous vehicle routing problem with time windows and carrier-dependent costs

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Scheduling, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Tabu search techniques for the heterogeneous vehicle routing problem with time windows and carrier-dependent costs
Published in
Journal of Scheduling, December 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10951-010-0213-x
Authors

Sara Ceschia, Luca Di Gaspero, Andrea Schaerf

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Unknown 49 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 12%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 16 31%
Computer Science 10 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 16%
Mathematics 2 4%
Decision Sciences 2 4%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2018.
All research outputs
#15,248,503
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Scheduling
#69
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,421
of 180,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Scheduling
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.