| Title |
Why is working memory capacity related to matrix reasoning tasks?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Memory & Cognition, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3758/s13421-014-0473-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tyler L. Harrison, Zach Shipstead, Randall W. Engle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Poland | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 30% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 31 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 92 | 60% |
| Linguistics | 6 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2016.
All research outputs
#15,377,977
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Memory & Cognition
#947
of 1,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,317
of 259,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memory & Cognition
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.