| Title |
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection JACC State-of-the-Art Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.084 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharonne N. Hayes, Marysia S. Tweet, David Adlam, Esther S.H. Kim, Rajiv Gulati, Joel E. Price, Carl H. Rose |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 223 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 46 | 21% |
| Spain | 14 | 6% |
| Mexico | 11 | 5% |
| Argentina | 7 | 3% |
| Colombia | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 5 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 18% |
| Unknown | 80 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 145 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 38 | 17% |
| Scientists | 26 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 213 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 78 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 46% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Psychology | 4 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 86 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 138. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2024.
All research outputs
#305,567
of 25,713,737 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#697
of 16,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,554
of 428,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#20
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,713,737 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,913 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,141 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.