↓ Skip to main content

Cardiovascular Benefits of Dietary Fiber

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#12 of 858)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
3 X users
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
136 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
195 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Cardiovascular Benefits of Dietary Fiber
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11883-012-0275-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ambika Satija, Frank B. Hu

Abstract

The relationship between dietary fiber and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been extensively studied. There is considerable epidemiological evidence indicating an inverse association between dietary fiber intake and CVD risk. The association has been found to be stronger for cereal fiber than for fruit or vegetable fiber, and several studies have also found increased whole grain consumption to be associated with CVD risk reduction. In light of this evidence, recent US dietary guidelines have endorsed increased consumption of fiber rich whole grains. Regular consumption of dietary fiber, particularly fiber from cereal sources, may improve CVD health through multiple mechanisms including lipid reduction, body weight regulation, improved glucose metabolism, blood pressure control, and reduction of chronic inflammation. Future research should focus on various food sources of fiber, including different types of whole grains, legumes, fruits, vegetables, and nuts, as well as resistant starch in relation to CVD risk and weight control; explore the biological mechanisms underlying the cardioprotective effect of fiber-rich diets; and study different ethnic groups and populations with varying sources of dietary fiber.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 191 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 22%
Student > Master 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 32 16%
Unknown 54 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Chemistry 7 4%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 60 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 166. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2024.
All research outputs
#243,488
of 25,306,238 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#12
of 858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,083
of 175,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,306,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.