| Title |
The Paradoxical Effects of COVID-19 on Cancer Care: Current Context and Potential Lasting Impacts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-2989 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alex Broom, Katherine Kenny, Alexander Page, Nicole Cort, Eric S. Lipp, Aaron C. Tan, David M. Ashley, Kyle M. Walsh, Mustafa Khasraw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 8 | 35% |
| Curaçao | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 83% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 185. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2021.
All research outputs
#191,175
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#84
of 12,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,666
of 415,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#1
of 189 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,778 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 189 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.