↓ Skip to main content

Changing climate—changing pathogens: Toxoplasma gondii in North-Western Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Parasitology Research, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 3,956)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
105 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Changing climate—changing pathogens: Toxoplasma gondii in North-Western Europe
Published in
Parasitology Research, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00436-009-1447-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bastiaan G. Meerburg, Aize Kijlstra

Abstract

In this review, we describe the effects of global climate change for one specific pathogen: the parasite Toxoplasma gondii. It is postulated that an increase of T. gondii prevalence in humans can occur in some regions of North-Western Europe as a result of changing environmental conditions. Such a change can be predicted by using Global Climate Change models. We have elaborated such a prediction for one scenario (SRES A1) by using one specific model (CCSR/NRIES) as an example. Next to environmental factors, also anthropogenic factors may contribute to increased prevalence of T. gondii in this region. In order to counter the potential severe consequences of a potential increase resulting from the combination of climatic and anthropogenic factors, there is an urgent need for the development of a human vaccine. Until a vaccine that offers complete protection is developed, the emphasis should be on treatment optimization and prevention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 3 2%
France 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 147 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Master 25 16%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Other 12 8%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 30 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 10%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 13 8%
Environmental Science 13 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 39 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,155,383
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Parasitology Research
#30
of 3,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,882
of 98,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasitology Research
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,956 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.