| Title |
Comparison of Readability of Official Public Health Information About COVID-19 on Websites of International Agencies and the Governments of 15 Countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Network Open, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18033 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vishala Mishra, Joseph P. Dexter |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 114 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 29 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 7% |
| Argentina | 7 | 6% |
| Australia | 7 | 6% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 44 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 78 | 68% |
| Scientists | 22 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 92 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 598. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2023.
All research outputs
#38,985
of 25,754,670 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Network Open
#418
of 9,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,510
of 427,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Network Open
#21
of 424 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,754,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 128.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,922 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 424 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.