↓ Skip to main content

The distinct roles of spirituality and religiosity in physical and mental health after collective trauma: a national longitudinal study of responses to the 9/11 attacks

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Behavioral Medicine, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
The distinct roles of spirituality and religiosity in physical and mental health after collective trauma: a national longitudinal study of responses to the 9/11 attacks
Published in
Journal of Behavioral Medicine, February 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10865-011-9331-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel N. McIntosh, Michael J. Poulin, Roxane Cohen Silver, E. Alison Holman

Abstract

Researchers have identified health implications of religiosity and spirituality but have rarely addressed differences between these dimensions. The associations of religiosity and spirituality with physical and mental health were examined in a national sample (N = 890) after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (9/11). Health information was collected before 9/11 and health, religiosity, and spirituality were assessed longitudinally during six waves of data collection over the next 3 years. Religiosity (i.e., participation in religious social structures) predicted higher positive affect (β = .12), fewer cognitive intrusions (β = -.07), and lower odds of new onset mental (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = .88) and musculoskeletal (IRR = .94) ailments. Spirituality (i.e., subjective commitment to spiritual or religious beliefs) predicted higher positive affect (β = .09), lower odds of new onset infectious ailments (IRR = 0.83), more intrusions (β = .10) and a more rapid decline in intrusions over time (β = -.10). Religiosity and spirituality independently predict health after a collective trauma, controlling for pre-event health status; they are not interchangeable indices of religion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Portugal 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 144 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 32 21%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 24 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 71 46%
Social Sciences 17 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2017.
All research outputs
#1,252,857
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#112
of 1,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,951
of 106,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Behavioral Medicine
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.