| Title |
Impact of visitor restriction rules on the postoperative experience of COVID-19 negative patients undergoing surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgery, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.surg.2020.08.010 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ryan D Zeh, Heena P Santry, Christina Monsour, Alan A Sumski, John F P Bridges, Allan Tsung, Timothy M Pawlik, Jordan M Cloyd |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 45% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Botswana | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 59% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 25% |
| Scientists | 5 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#975,989
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Surgery
#122
of 6,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,107
of 425,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgery
#10
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.