↓ Skip to main content

Factors Associated with Never Being Screened for Colorectal Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Community Health, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Factors Associated with Never Being Screened for Colorectal Cancer
Published in
Journal of Community Health, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10900-012-9600-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandte L. Stanley, Jessica B. King, Cheryll C. Thomas, Lisa C. Richardson

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is underused in the United States, and non-adherence with screening recommendations is high in some populations. This study describes the characteristics of people who have never been screened for CRC. In addition, we use the health belief model to examine the constructs associated with screening behavior. We used data from the 2010 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) to create three study outcomes: people who have been screened for CRC and are up-to-date with current recommendations, people who have been screened but are not up-to-date, and people who have never been screened. We used multivariate logistic regression modeling to calculate predicted marginal estimates examining the associations between the screening outcomes and demographic and Health Belief Model (HBM) characteristics. Overall 29% of respondents had never been screened for CRC. In the adjusted model, 36.6% of US adults age 50-59 years and 29.1% of US men reported never being screened for CRC. More Asian/Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander, non-Hispanics (38.2%) reported never being screened than members of other racial and ethnic groups. Nearly 37% of people with less than a high school diploma reported never being screened. We found statistically significant differences among screening outcomes for all demographics and HBM constructs except could not see a doctor because of costs in the last 12 months, where approximately 29% reported no CRC screening. New interventions should focus on those subpopulations that have never been screened for CRC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 43 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 16%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 12 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 20%
Psychology 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 14 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#4,088,216
of 25,109,675 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Community Health
#250
of 1,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,917
of 174,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Community Health
#4
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,332 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.