You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
鹿児島県奄美群島喜界島におけるギンブナとキンギョの採集記録
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Izunuma-Uchinuma Wetland Researches, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.20745/izu.14.0_103 |
| Authors |
中島 淳, 大井 和之, 富 充弘, 伊地知 告 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 16 | 33% |
| Austria | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,312,007
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Izunuma-Uchinuma Wetland Researches
#7
of 38 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,597
of 428,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Izunuma-Uchinuma Wetland Researches
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 38 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one scored the same or higher as 31 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them