↓ Skip to main content

Vascular disrupting activity and the mechanism of action of EHT 6706, a novel anticancer tubulin polymerization inhibitor

Overview of attention for article published in Investigational New Drugs, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Vascular disrupting activity and the mechanism of action of EHT 6706, a novel anticancer tubulin polymerization inhibitor
Published in
Investigational New Drugs, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10637-012-9858-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne-Sophie Belzacq-Casagrande, Florence Bachelot, Catherine De Oliveira, Séverine Coutadeur, Florence Maurier-Mahé, Emeline Throo, Cédric Chauvignac, Laure Pognante, Angélique Petibon, Thierry Taverne, Eric Beausoleil, Bertrand Leblond, Matthew P. Pando, Laurent Désiré

Abstract

Tumor blood vessels are an important emerging target for anticancer therapy. Here, we characterize the in vitro antiproliferative and antiangiogenic properties of the synthetic small molecule, 7-ethoxy-4-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzyl)isoquinolin-8-amine dihydrochloride, EHT 6706, a novel microtubule-disrupting agent that targets the colchicine-binding site to inhibit tubulin polymerization. At low nM concentrations, EHT 6706 exhibits highly potent antiproliferative activity on more than 60 human tumor cell lines, even those described as being drug resistant. EHT 6706 also shows strong efficacy as a vascular-disrupting agent, since it prevents endothelial cell tube formation and disrupts pre-established vessels, changes the permeability of endothelial cell monolayers and inhibits endothelial cell migration. Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of EHT 6706 effects on human endothelial cells shows that the antiangiogenic activity elicits gene deregulations of antiangiogenic pathways. These findings indicate that EHT 6706 is a promising tubulin-binding compound with potentially broad clinical antitumor efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 36%
Other 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Chemistry 2 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2012.
All research outputs
#18,312,024
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from Investigational New Drugs
#873
of 1,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,523
of 167,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Investigational New Drugs
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,164 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.