↓ Skip to main content

Pain Adversely Affects Outcomes to a Collaborative Care Intervention for Anxiety in Primary Care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
Title
Pain Adversely Affects Outcomes to a Collaborative Care Intervention for Anxiety in Primary Care
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11606-012-2186-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalia E. Morone, Bea Herbeck Belnap, Fanyin He, Sati Mazumdar, Debra K. Weiner, Bruce L. Rollman

Abstract

Primary care patients with Panic Disorder (PD) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) experience poorer than expected clinical outcomes, despite the availability of efficacious pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic treatments. A barrier to recovery from PD/GAD may be the co-occurrence of pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 68 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 16%
Student > Bachelor 10 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 15%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 25%
Psychology 16 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 10%
Social Sciences 4 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 17 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,406,676
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3,998
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,395
of 169,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#39
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,484 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.