↓ Skip to main content

Predicting Compensation Voltage for Singly-charged Ions in High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS)

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Predicting Compensation Voltage for Singly-charged Ions in High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry (FAIMS)
Published in
Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s13361-012-0427-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander A. Aksenov, James Kapron, Cristina E. Davis

Abstract

Correlation between compensation voltage (CV) and the m/z ratio of singly-charged ions was elucidated. The experimental data for various alkylammonium homologues and various pharmaceutical compounds were used to construct empirical calibration curves that were fit using commercial regression analysis software packages. The best fit equations were applied to calculate the CV differences (ΔCV) in pure N(2) and N(2)/He 50/50 carrier gasses and CV values for a variety of compounds using only m/z values. The calculated values were in good agreement with experimental data and ΔCV values exhibited a very strong correlation with m/z. Application of these empirical calculations may provide a powerful CV prediction tool for researchers using high-field asymmetric waveform ion mobility spectrometry (FAIMS) and increase the value of FAIMS as an analytical method.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 56%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2012.
All research outputs
#23,065,269
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#3,475
of 3,874 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,498
of 185,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
#38
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,874 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.