You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Sensitivity Analysis of Thermal Hydraulic Response in Containment at Core Meltdown Accident
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan, January 1985
|
| DOI | 10.3327/jaesj.27.56 |
| Authors |
Kensuke KOBAYASHI, Hideo HORII, Tsutomu ISHIGAMI, Takemi CHIBA |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 29 | 34% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 55 | 65% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 99% |
| Scientists | 1 | 1% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2020.
All research outputs
#777,987
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan
#3
of 224 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136
of 39,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Atomic Energy Society of Japan / Atomic Energy Society of Japan
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them