↓ Skip to main content

Anti- and Pro-apoptotic Bcl2 Proteins Distribution and Metabolic Profile in Human Coronary Aorta Endothelial Cells Before and After HypPDT

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Anti- and Pro-apoptotic Bcl2 Proteins Distribution and Metabolic Profile in Human Coronary Aorta Endothelial Cells Before and After HypPDT
Published in
Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12013-016-0740-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mária Maslaňáková, Lucia Balogová, Pavol Miškovský, Ružena Tkáčová, Katarína Štroffeková

Abstract

Understanding apoptosis regulatory mechanisms in endothelial cells (ECs) has great importance for the development of novel therapy strategies for cancer and cardiovascular pathologies. An oxidative stress with the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is a common mechanism causing ECs' dysfunction and apoptosis. The generation of ROS can be triggered by various stimuli including photodynamic therapy (PDT). In most PDT treatments, photosensitizer (PS) is administered systemically, and thus, possibility of high exposure to PS in the ECs remains high. PS accumulation in ECs may be clinically relevant even without PDT, if PS molecules affect the pro-apoptotic cascade without illumination. In the present work, we focused on Hypericin (Hyp) and HypPDT effects on the cell viability, oxidative stress, and the distribution of Bcl2 family members in human coronary artery endothelial (HCAEC) cells. Our findings show that the presence of Hyp itself has an effect on cell viability, oxidative stress, and the distribution of Bcl2 family members, without affecting the mitochondria function. In contrast, HypPDT resulted in mitochondria dysfunction, further increase of oxidative stress and effect on the distribution of Bcl2 family members, and in primarily necrotic type of death in HCAEC cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 33%
Student > Postgraduate 2 22%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Psychology 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,333,181
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#563
of 911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,136
of 352,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Biochemistry and Biophysics
#17
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.