↓ Skip to main content

Long-distance translocations to create a second millerbird population and reduce extinction risk

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-distance translocations to create a second millerbird population and reduce extinction risk
Published in
Biological Conservation, July 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.006
Authors

Holly B. Freifeld, Sheldon Plentovich, Chris Farmer, Charles R. Kohley, Peter Luscomb, Thierry M. Work, Daniel Tsukayama, George E. Wallace, Mark A. MacDonald, Sheila Conant

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 25%
Student > Master 10 19%
Researcher 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 46%
Environmental Science 14 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2016.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#5,834
of 6,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,554
of 367,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#56
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,612 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,266 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.