↓ Skip to main content

Light-mimicking cockroaches indicate Tertiary origin of recent terrestrial luminescence

Overview of attention for article published in The Science of Nature, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
16 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Light-mimicking cockroaches indicate Tertiary origin of recent terrestrial luminescence
Published in
The Science of Nature, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00114-012-0956-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Vršanský, Dušan Chorvát, Ingo Fritzsche, Miroslav Hain, Robert Ševčík

Abstract

Bioluminescence is a common feature of the communication and defence of marine organisms, but this phenomenon is highly restricted in the terrestrial biota. Here, we present a geographical distribution of only the third order of luminescent insects--luminescent cockroaches, with all 13 known and/or herein reported new living species (based on deposited specimens). We show that, for the first time, photo-characteristics of three examined species are nearly identical with those of toxic luminescent click beetles, which they mimic. These observations are the evidence for the mimicry by light--a new type of defensive, batesian and interordinal mimicry. Our analysis surprisingly reveals an evolutionary novelty of all living luminescent insects, while in the sea (and possibly in the soil) luminescence is present also phylogenetically in very primitive organisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Germany 2 3%
Colombia 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Unknown 60 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 22%
Student > Bachelor 15 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 7%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 54%
Environmental Science 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 11 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 64. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2022.
All research outputs
#684,884
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#85
of 2,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,403
of 180,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.