| Title |
Genome-wide association study of glioma and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Genetics, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00439-012-1212-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Preetha Rajaraman, Beatrice S. Melin, Zhaoming Wang, Roberta McKean-Cowdin, Dominique S. Michaud, Sophia S. Wang, Melissa Bondy, Richard Houlston, Robert B. Jenkins, Margaret Wrensch, Meredith Yeager, Anders Ahlbom, Demetrius Albanes, Ulrika Andersson, Laura E. Beane Freeman, Julie E. Buring, Mary Ann Butler, Melissa Braganza, Tania Carreon, Maria Feychting, Sarah J. Fleming, Susan M. Gapstur, J. Michael Gaziano, Graham G. Giles, Goran Hallmans, Roger Henriksson, Judith Hoffman-Bolton, Peter D. Inskip, Christoffer Johansen, Cari M. Kitahara, Mark Lathrop, Chenwei Liu, Loic Le Marchand, Martha S. Linet, Stefan Lonn, Ulrike Peters, Mark P. Purdue, Nathaniel Rothman, Avima M. Ruder, Marc Sanson, Howard D. Sesso, Gianluca Severi, Xiao-Ou Shu, Matthias Simon, Meir Stampfer, Victoria L. Stevens, Kala Visvanathan, Emily White, Alicja Wolk, Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte, Wei Zheng, Paul Decker, Victor Enciso-Mora, Brooke Fridley, Yu-Tang Gao, Matthew Kosel, Daniel H. Lachance, Ching Lau, Terri Rice, Anthony Swerdlow, Joseph L. Wiemels, John K. Wiencke, Sanjay Shete, Yong-Bing Xiang, Yuanyuan Xiao, Robert N. Hoover, Joseph F. Fraumeni, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Patricia Hartge, Stephen J. Chanock |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 28% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2012.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,745
of 3,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,916
of 190,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#14
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,050 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.