You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
When financial incentives do more good than harm: a checklist
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.e5047 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul P Glasziou, Heather Buchan, Chris Del Mar, Jenny Doust, Mark Harris, Rosemary Knight, Anthony Scott, Ian A Scott, Alexis Stockwell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 134 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 29 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 42% |
| Social Sciences | 13 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 June 2018.
All research outputs
#955,964
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#9,962
of 64,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,169
of 186,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#62
of 811 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 811 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.