↓ Skip to main content

ウンム・クルスーム研究

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Ethnology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#10 of 171)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ウンム・クルスーム研究
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ethnology, May 2018
DOI 10.14890/minkennewseries.65.1_42
Authors

水野 信男

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,360,834
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Ethnology
#10
of 171 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,653
of 339,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Ethnology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 171 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them