| Title |
Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology and Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sung-Han Yoon, Won-Keun Kim, Abhijeet Dhoble, Stephan Milhorini Pio, Vasilis Babaliaros, Hasan Jilaihawi, Thomas Pilgrim, Ole De Backer, Sabine Bleiziffer, Flavien Vincent, Tobias Schmidit, Christian Butter, Norihiko Kamioka, Lena Eschenbach, Matthias Renker, Masahiko Asami, Mohamad Lazkani, Buntaro Fujita, Antoinette Birs, Marco Barbanti, Ashish Pershad, Uri Landes, Brad Oldemeyer, Mitusnobu Kitamura, Luke Oakley, Tomoki Ochiai, Tarun Chakravarty, Mamoo Nakamura, Philip Ruile, Florian Deuschl, Daniel Berman, Thomas Modine, Stephan Ensminger, Ran Kornowski, Rudiger Lange, James M. McCabe, Mathew R. Williams, Brian Whisenant, Victoria Delgado, Stephan Windecker, Eric Van Belle, Lars Sondergaard, Bernard Chevalier, Michael Mack, Jeroen J. Bax, Martin B. Leon, Raj R. Makkar, Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Registry Investigators |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 149 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 36 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 8% |
| Canada | 7 | 5% |
| Italy | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| France | 3 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 15% |
| Unknown | 50 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 94 | 63% |
| Scientists | 26 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 14% |
| Other | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 16% |
| Unknown | 61 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 37% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 70 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2023.
All research outputs
#424,393
of 25,757,133 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,024
of 16,935 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,691
of 426,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#31
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,757,133 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,935 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.