| Title |
A Guide to Navigating Virtual Cardiovascular Disease Fellowship Interviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC: Case Reports, September 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.08.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nosheen Reza, Kathryn Berlacher, John A. McPherson, Nadeen N. Faza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 143 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 97 | 68% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Romania | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 36 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 86 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 25 | 17% |
| Scientists | 18 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 25% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Design | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#468,100
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Case Reports
#29
of 1,584 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,887
of 429,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Case Reports
#5
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,584 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.