↓ Skip to main content

Influence of procalcitonin on decision to start antibiotic treatment in patients with a lower respiratory tract infection: insight from the observational multicentric ProREAL surveillance

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Influence of procalcitonin on decision to start antibiotic treatment in patients with a lower respiratory tract infection: insight from the observational multicentric ProREAL surveillance
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, August 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10096-012-1713-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Dusemund, B. Bucher, S. Meyer, R. Thomann, F. Kühn, S. Bassetti, M. Sprenger, E. Baechli, T. Sigrist, M. Schwietert, D. Amin, P. Hausfater, E. Carre, P. Schuetz, J. Gaillat, K. Regez, R. Bossart, U. Schild, B. Müller, W. C. Albrich, For the ProREAL study team

Abstract

Procalcitonin (PCT)-guided antibiotic stewardship is a successful strategy to decrease antibiotic use. We assessed if clinical judgement affected compliance with a PCT-algorithm for antibiotic prescribing in a multicenter surveillance of patients with lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). Initiation and duration of antibiotic therapy, adherence to a PCT algorithm and outcome were monitored in consecutive adults with LRTI who were enrolled in a prospective observational quality control. We correlated initial clinical judgment of the treating physician with algorithm compliance and assessed the influence of PCT on the final decision to initiate antibiotic therapy. PCT levels correlated with physicians' estimates of the likelihood of bacterial infection (p for trend <0.02). PCT influenced the post-test probability of antibiotic initiation with a greater effect in patients with non-pneumonia LRTI (e.g., for bronchitis: -23 % if PCT ≤ 0.25 μg/L and +31 % if PCT > 0.25 μg/L), in European centers (e.g., in France -22 % if PCT ≤ 0.25 μg/L and +13 % if PCT > 0.25 μg/L) and in centers, which had previous experience with the PCT-algorithm (-16 % if PCT ≤ 0.25 μg/L and +19 % if PCT > 0.25 μg/L). Algorithm non-compliance, i.e. antibiotic prescribing despite low PCT-levels, was independently predicted by the likelihood of a bacterial infection as judged by the treating physician. Compliance was significantly associated with identification of a bacterial etiology (p = 0.01). Compliance with PCT-guided antibiotic stewardship was affected by geographically and culturally-influenced subjective clinical judgment. Initiation of antibiotic therapy was altered by PCT levels. Differential compliance with antibiotic stewardship efforts contributes to geographical differences in antibiotic prescribing habits and potentially influences antibiotic resistance rates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 74 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Other 8 10%
Student > Master 6 8%
Professor 5 6%
Other 20 26%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 51%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 17 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,266,976
of 22,673,450 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#1,581
of 2,768 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,185
of 167,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,673,450 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,768 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.