↓ Skip to main content

CT of the normal suspensory ligaments of the ossicles in the middle ear.

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Neuroradiology, March 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CT of the normal suspensory ligaments of the ossicles in the middle ear.
Published in
American Journal of Neuroradiology, March 1997
Pubmed ID
Authors

M M Lemmerling, H E Stambuk, A A Mancuso, P J Antonelli, P S Kubilis

Abstract

To establish the range of normal variation in the CT appearance of the middle ear ligaments and the stapedius tendon as an aid in detecting abnormal changes in these structures. CT scans of the temporal bone in 75 normal middle ears, obtained with 1-mm-thick sections, were reviewed by two observers, who rated the visibility of the structures of interest on a scale of 1 to 5. The anterior, superior, and lateral malleal ligaments and the medial and lateral parts of the posterior incudal ligament were seen in 68%, 46%, 95%, 26%, and 34% of the ears, respectively. The stapedius tendon was seen in 27% of the cases. When visible, the ligaments were judged to be complete in 90% to 100% of the ears and the stapedius tendon was complete in 65% of cases. Their width varied considerably. Interobserver variability was high for most observations. CT scans are more likely to show the malleal than the incudal ligaments. Although the interobserver agreement was statistically significant for most study parameters, the percentage of agreement above that expected by chance was low. When seen, the ligaments usually appeared complete. Understanding the normal range of appearance may help identify abnormalities of the ligaments and tendons of the middle ear.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 3 7%
Sudan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 36 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 30%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 20%
Other 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 3 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 57%
Physics and Astronomy 6 14%
Mathematics 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Neuroscience 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,027,635
of 25,502,817 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#628
of 5,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,815
of 29,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,502,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,277 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,119 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them