You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
BRCA1 R1699Q variant displaying ambiguous functional abrogation confers intermediate breast and ovarian cancer risk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Medical Genetics, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/jmedgenet-2012-101037 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Amanda B Spurdle, Phillip J Whiley, Bryony Thompson, Bingjian Feng, Sue Healey, Melissa A Brown, Christopher Pettigrew, kConFab, Christi J Van Asperen, Margreet G E M Ausems, Anna A Kattentidt-Mouravieva, Ans M W van den Ouweland, Dutch Belgium UV Consortium, Annika Lindblom, Maritta H Pigg, Rita K Schmutzler, Christoph Engel, Alfons Meindl, German Consortium of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Sandrine Caputo, Olga M Sinilnikova, Rosette Lidereau, French COVAR group collaborators, Fergus J Couch, Lucia Guidugli, Thomas van Overeem Hansen, Mads Thomassen, Diana M Eccles, Kathy Tucker, Javier Benitez, Susan M Domchek, Amanda E Toland, Elizabeth J Van Rensburg, Barbara Wappenschmidt, Åke Borg, Maaike P G Vreeswijk, David E Goldgar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 22% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2017.
All research outputs
#20,356,726
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Genetics
#2,940
of 3,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,411
of 189,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Genetics
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,177 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 189,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.