You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ethical frameworks for quality improvement activities: an analysis of international practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Quality in Health Care, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa092 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Corina Naughton, Elaine Meehan, Elaine Lehane, Ciara Landers, Sarah Jane Flaherty, Aoife Lane, Margaret Landers, Caroline Kilty, Mohamad Saab, John Goodwin, Nuala Walshe, Teresa Wills, Vera Mccarthy, Siobhan Murphy, Joan Mccarthy, Helen Cummins, Deirdre Madden, Josephine Hegarty |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 52% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#13,175,336
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#1,118
of 1,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,495
of 399,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Quality in Health Care
#29
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.