↓ Skip to main content

Oprekken van de leeftijdsgrens (kind-volwassene) is noodzakelijk

Overview of attention for article published in Jeugdbeleid, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Oprekken van de leeftijdsgrens (kind-volwassene) is noodzakelijk
Published in
Jeugdbeleid, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12451-016-0115-9
Authors

Philip Veerman, Peter Greeven

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,333,181
of 22,877,793 outputs
Outputs from Jeugdbeleid
#17
of 17 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,587
of 341,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Jeugdbeleid
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,877,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them